Showing posts with label Population. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Population. Show all posts

Friday, August 23, 2019

Yuma Indian Facts

Yuma Indian Facts



The valley of the Colorado River in Arizona, the peninsula of California and portions of the eastern shore of the Gulf of California, formed the home of the Yuma stock. They were found in these regions by Coronado as early as 1540, and own no traditions of having lived anywhere else. The considerable differences in their dialects within this comparatively small area indicates that a long period has elapsed since the stock settled in this locality and split up into hostile fractions.

It has also been called the Katchan or Cuchan stock, and the Apache, that being the Yuma word for “fighting men”; but we should confine the term Apaches to the Tinneh (Athapascan) tribe so
called, and to avoid confusion I shall dismiss the terms Apache-Yumas, Apache-Tontos and Apache-Mohaves, employed by some writers. The Yumas, from whom the stock derives its name, lived near the mouth of the Colorado River. Above them, on both banks of the river, were the Mohaves, and further up, principally on Virgin River, were the Yavapai.

Most of the Yumas are of good stature, the adult males averaging five feet nine inches high, well built and vigorous. The color varies from a dark to a light mahogany; the hair is straight and coarse, the eyes horizontal, the mouth large, and the lips heavy. The skull is generally brachycephalic, but there are a number of cases of extreme dolichocephaly .

Animal totems with descent in the male line prevailed among the Yumas, though they seem for a long time not to have regarded these matters closely. In culture they vary considerably. The Seris or Ceris, who formerly lived in the hills near Horcasitas, but in 1779 were removed to the island of Tiburon, are described as thieves and vagrants, lazy and wretched. They were exceedingly troublesome to the Mexican government, having revolted over forty times. The boats they use are of a peculiar construction, consisting of rushes tied together. As weapons up to recent years they preferred the bow and arrow, and upon the arrow laid some kind of poison which prevented the wounds from healing.
Their dialect, which is harsh, is related especially to the western branch of the Yuma stem. They are described as light in color and some of them good-looking, but filthy in habits.

The Yumas and Maricopas were agricultural, cultivating large fields of corn and beans, and irrigating their plantations by trenches. It is highly probable that formerly some of them dwelt in adobe houses of the pueblo character, and were the authors of some of the numerous ruined structures seen in southern Arizona. The pottery and basket work turned out by their women are superior in style and finish. A few years ago the Mohaves of the west bank lived in holes in the earth covered with brush, or in small wattled conical huts. For clothing they wore strips of cottonwood bark, or knotted grass. Tattooing and painting the person in divers colors were common. The favorite ornament was shells, arranged on strings, or engraved and suspended to the neck. The chiefs wore elaborate feather head-dresses.

The Tontos, so-called from their reputation for stupidity, are largely mixed with Tinné blood, their women having been captured from the Apaches. Though savage, they are by no means dull, and are considered uncommonly adept thieves.

Quite to the south, in the mountains of Oaxaca and Guerrero, the Tequistlatecas, usually known by the
meaningless term Chontales, belong to this stem, judging from the imperfect vocabularies which have been published.

The peninsula of California was inhabited by several Yuma tribes differing in dialect but much alike in culture, all being on its lowest stage. Wholly unacquainted with metals, without agriculture of any kind, naked, and constructing no sort of permanent shelters, they depended on fishing, hunting and natural products for subsistence. Their weapons were the bow and the lance, which they pointed with sharpened stones. Canoes were unknown, and what little they did in navigation was upon rafts of reeds and brush.

Marriages among them were by individual preference, and are said not to have respected the limits of consanguinity; but this is doubtful, as we are also told that the mother-in-law was treated with peculiar ceremony. Their rites for the dead indicate a belief in the survival of the individual. The body was buried and after a certain time the bones were cleaned, painted red, and preserved in ossuaries.

The population was sparse, probably not more than ten thousand on the whole peninsula. At the extreme south were the Pericus, who extended to N. Lat. 24°; beyond these lived the Guaicurus to about Lat. 26°; and in the northern portion of the peninsula to latitude 33° the Cochimis. The early writers state that in appearance these bands did not differ from the Mexicans on the other side of the Gulf.
Their skulls, however, which have been collected principally from the district of the Pericus, present a peculiar degree of elongation and height (dolichocephalic and hypsistenocephalic).

YUMA LINGUISTIC STOCK.

  • Ceris, on Tiburon Island and the adjacent coast.
  • Cochimis, northern portion of Californian peninsula.
  • Cocopas, at mouth of Colorado river.
  • Coco-Maricopas, on middle Gila river.
  • Comeyas, between lower Colorado and the Pacific.
  • Coninos, on Cataract creek, branch of the Colorado.
  • Cuchanes, see Yumas.
  • Diegueños, near San Diego on the Pacific.
  • Gohunes, on Rio Salado and Rio Verde.
  • Guaicurus, middle portion of Californian peninsula.
  • Hualapais, from lower Colorado to Black Mountains.
  • Maricopas, see Coco-Maricopas.
  • Mohaves, on both banks of lower Colorado.
  • Pericus, southern extremity of Californian peninsula.
  • Tontos, in Tonto basin and in the Pinal mountains.
  • Tequistlatecas, of Oaxaca and Guerrero.
  • Yavipais, west of Prescott, Arizona.
  • Yumas, near mouth of Colorado river.

Monday, March 26, 2012

About Eskimo Indian Tribes, Population and Lands


ABOUT ESKIMO INDIAN TRIBES



ESKIMOS INDIANS GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION, POPULATION AND LANDS
The geographic boundaries of this family were set forth by Gallatin in 1836 with considerable precision, and require comparatively little revision and correction.
In the linear extent of country occupied, the Eskimo's is the most remarkable of the North American linguistic families. It extends coastwise from eastern Greenland to western Alaska and to the extremity of the Aleutian Islands, a distance of considerably more than 5,000 miles. The winter or permanent villages are usually situated on the coast and are frequently at considerable distances from one another, the intervening areas being usually visited in summer for hunting and fishing purposes. The interior is also visited by the Eskimo for the purpose of hunting reindeer and other animals, though they rarely penetrate farther than 50 miles. A narrow strip along the coast, perhaps 30 miles wide, will probably, on the average, represent Eskimo occupancy.
Except upon the Aleutian Islands, the dialects spoken over this vast area are very similar, the unity of dialect thus observable being in marked contrast to the tendency to change exhibited in other linguistic families of North America.
How far north the east coast of Greenland is inhabited by Eskimo is not at present known. In 1823 Capt. Clavering met with two families of Eskimo north of 74° 30'. Recent explorations (1884-’85) by Capt. Holm, of the Danish Navy, along the southeast coast reveal the presence of Eskimo between 65° and 66° north latitude. These Eskimo profess entire ignorance of any inhabitants north of themselves, which may be taken as proof that if there are fiords farther up the coast which are inhabited there has been no intercommunication in recent times at least between these tribes and those to the south. It seems probable that more or less isolated colonies of Eskimo do actually exist along the east coast of Greenland far to the north.
Along the west coast of Greenland, Eskimo occupancy extends to about 74°. This division is separated by a considerable interval of uninhabited coast from the Etah Eskimo who occupy the coast from Smith Sound to Cape York, their most northerly village being in 7378° 18'. For our knowledge of these interesting people we are chiefly indebted to Ross and Bessels.
In Grinnell Land, Gen. Greely found indications of permanent Eskimo habitations near Fort Conger, lat. 81° 44'.
On the coast of Labrador the Eskimo reach as far south as Hamilton Inlet, about 55° 30'. Not long since they extended to the Straits of Belle Isle, 50° 30'.
On the east coast of Hudson Bay the Eskimo reach at present nearly to James Bay. According to Dobbs in 1744 they extended as far south as east Maine River, or about 52°. The name Notaway (Eskimo) River at the southern end of the bay indicates a former Eskimo extension to that point.
According to Boas and Bessels the most northern Eskimo of the middle group north of Hudson Bay reside on the southern extremity of Ellesmere Land around Jones Sound. Evidences of former occupation of Prince Patrick, Melville, and other of the northern Arctic islands are not lacking, but for some unknown cause, probably a failure of food supply, the Eskimo have migrated thence and the islands are no longer inhabited. In the western part of the central region the coast appears to be uninhabited from the Coppermine River to Cape Bathurst. To the west of the Mackenzie, Herschel Island marks the limit of permanent occupancy by the Mackenzie Eskimo, there being no permanent villages between that island and the settlements at Point Barrow.
The intervening strip of coast is, however, undoubtedly hunted over more or less in summer. The Point Barrow Eskimo do not penetrate far into the interior, but farther to the south the Eskimo reach to the headwaters of the Nunatog and Koyuk Rivers. Only visiting the coast for trading purposes, they occupy an anomalous position among Eskimo.
Eskimo occupancy of the rest of the Alaska coast is practically continuous throughout its whole extent as far to the south and east as the Atna or Copper River, where begin the domains of the Koluschan family. Only in two places do the Indians of the Athapascan family intrude upon Eskimo territory, about Cook’s Inlet, and at the mouth of Copper River.
Owing to the labors of Dall, Petroff, Nelson, Turner, Murdoch, and others we are now pretty well informed as to the distribution of the Eskimo in Alaska.
Nothing is said by Gallatin of the Aleutian Islanders and they were probably not considered by him to be Eskimauan. They are now known to belong to this family, though the Aleutian dialects are unintelligible to the Eskimo proper. Their distribution has been entirely changed since the advent of the Russians and the introduction 74of the fur trade, and at present they occupy only a very small portion of the islands. Formerly they were much more numerous than at present and extended throughout the chain.
The Eskimauan family is represented in northeast Asia by the Yuit of the Chukchi peninsula, who are to be distinguished from the sedentary Chukchi or the Tuski of authors, the latter being of Asiatic origin. According to Dall the former are comparatively recent arrivals from the American continent, and, like their brethren of America, are confined exclusively to the coast.
PRINCIPAL TRIBES AND VILLAGES.
Greenland group—East Greenland villages:
Akorninak.
Aluik.
Anarnitsok.
Angmagsalik.
Igdlolnarsuk.
Ivimiut.
Kemisak.
Kikkertarsoak.
Kinarbik.
Maneetsuk.
Narsuk.
Okkiosorbik.
Sermiligak.
Sermilik.
Taterat.
Umanak.
Umerik.
West coast villages:
Akbat.Karsuit.Tessuisak.
Labrador group:
Itivimiut.
Kiguaqtagmiut.
Suqinimiut.Taqagmiut.
Middle Group:
Aggomiut.
Ahaknanelet.
Aivillirmiut.
Akudliarmiut.
Akudnirmiut.
Amitormiut.
Iglulingmiut.
Kangormiut.
Kinnepatu.
Kramalit.
Nageuktormiut.
Netchillirmiut.
Nugumiut.
Okomiut.
Pilinginiut.
Sagdlirmiut.
Sikosuilarmiut.
Sinimiut.
Ugjulirmiut.
Ukusiksalingmiut.
Alaska group:
Chiglit.
Chugachigmiut.
Ikogmiut.
Imahklimiut.
Inguhklimiut.
Kaialigmiut.
Kangmaligmiut.
Kaviagmiut.
Kittegareut.
Kopagmiut.
Kuagmiut.
Kuskwogmiut.
Magemiut.
Mahlemiut.
Nunatogmiut.
Nunivagmiut.
Nushagagmiut.
Nuwungmiut.
Oglemiut.
Selawigmiut.
Shiwokugmiut.
Ukivokgmiut.
Unaligmiut.
Aleutian group:
Atka.Unalashka.
Asiatic group:
Yuit.
Population.—Only a rough approximation of the population of the Eskimo can be given, since of some of the divisions next to 75nothing is known. Dall compiles the following estimates of the Alaskan Eskimo from the most reliable figures up to 1885: Of the Northwestern Innuit 3,100 (?), including the Kopagmiut, Kangmaligmiut, Nuwukmiut, Nunatogmiut, Kuagmiut, the Inguhklimiut of Little Diomede Island 40 (?), Shiwokugmiut of St. Lawrence Island 150 (?), the Western Innuit 14,500 (?), the Aleutian Islanders (Unungun) 2,200 (?); total of the Alaskan Innuit, about 20,000.
The Central or Baffin Land Eskimo are estimated by Boas to number about 1,100.
From figures given by Rink, Packard, and others, the total number of Labrador Eskimo is believed to be about 2,000.
According to Holm (1884-’85) there are about 550 Eskimo on the east coast of Greenland. On the west coast the mission Eskimo numbered 10,122 in 1886, while the northern Greenland Eskimo, the Arctic Highlanders of Ross, number about 200.
Thus throughout the Arctic regions generally there is a total of about 34,000.

The population of the Different Algonquin Tribes

The population of the Different Algonquin Tribes


The area formerly occupied by the Algonquian family was more extensive than that of any other linguistic stock in North America, their territory reaching from Labrador to the Rocky Mountains, and from Churchill River of Hudson Bay as far south at least as Pamlico Sound of North Carolina. In the eastern part of this territory was an area occupied by Iroquoian tribes, surrounded on almost all sides by their Algonquian neighbors. On the south the Algonquian tribes were bordered by those of Iroquoian and Siouan (Catawba) stock, on the southwest and west by the Muskhogean and Siouan tribes, and on the northwest by the Kitunahan and the great Athapascan families, while along the coast of Labrador and the eastern shore of Hudson Bay they came in contact with the Eskimo, who were gradually retreating before them to the north. In Newfoundland they encountered the Beothukan family, consisting of but a single tribe. A portion of the Shawnee at some early period had separated from the main body of the tribe in central Tennessee and pushed their way down to the Savannah River in South Carolina, where, known as Savannahs, they carried on destructive wars with the surrounding tribes until about the beginning of the eighteenth century they were finally driven out and joined the Delaware in the north. Soon afterwards the rest of the tribe was expelled by the Cherokee and Chicasa, who thenceforward claimed all the country stretching north to the Ohio River.
48The Cheyenne and Arapaho, two allied tribes of this stock, had become separated from their kindred on the north and had forced their way through hostile tribes across the Missouri to the Black Hills country of South Dakota, and more recently into Wyoming and Colorado, thus forming the advance guard of the Algonquian stock in that direction, having the Siouan tribes behind them and those of the Shoshonean family in front.
PRINCIPAL ALGONQUINIAN TRIBES.
Abnaki.
Algonquin.
Arapaho.
Cheyenne.
Conoy.
Cree.
Delaware.
Fox.
Illinois.
Kickapoo.
Mahican.
Massachuset.
Menominee.
Miami.
Micmac.
Mohegan.
Montagnais.
Montauk.
Munsee.
Nanticoke.
Narraganset.
Nauset.
Nipmuc.
Ojibwa.
Ottawa.
Pamlico.
Pennacook.
Pequot.
Piankishaw.
Pottawotomi.
Powhatan.
Sac.
Shawnee.
Siksika.
Wampanoag.
Wappinger.
Population.—The present number of the Algonquian stock is about 95,600, of whom about 60,000 are in Canada and the remainder in the United States. Below is given the population of the tribes officially recognized, compiled chiefly from the United States Indian Commissioner’s report for 1889 and the Canadian Indian report for 1888. It is impossible to give exact figures, owing to the fact that in many instances two or more tribes are enumerated together, while many individuals are living with other tribes or amongst the whites:
Abnaki:
“Oldtown Indians,” Maine410
Passamaquoddy Indians, Maine215?
Abenakis of St. Francis and Bécancour, Quebec
369
“Amalecites” of Témiscouata and Viger, Quebec
198
“Amalecites” of Madawaska, etc., New Brunswick
683
1,874?
Algonquin:
Of Renfrew, Golden Lake and Carleton, Ontario
797
With Iroquois (total 131) at Gibson, Ontario
31?
With Iroquois at Lake of Two Mountains, Quebec30
Quebec Province3,909
4,767?
Arapaho:
Cheyenne and Arapaho Agency, Indian Territory
1,272
Shoshone Agency, Wyoming (Northern Arapaho)
885
Carlisle school, Pennsylvania, and Lawrence school, Kansas
55
2,212
49Cheyenne:
Pine Ridge Agency, South Dakota (Northern Cheyenne)
517
Cheyenne and Arapaho Agency, Indian Territory
2,091
Carlisle school, Pennsylvania, and Lawrence school, Kansas
153
Tongue River Agency, Montana (Northern Cheyenne)865
3,626
Cree:
With Salteau in Manitoba, etc., British America (treaties Nos. 1, 2, and 5: total, 6,066)
3,066?
Plain and Wood Cree, treaty No. 6, Manitoba, etc.5,790
Cree (with Salteau, etc.), treaty No. 4, Manitoba, etc.8,530
17,386?
Delaware, etc.:
Kiowa, Comanche, and Wichita Agency, Indian Territory
95
Incorporated with Cherokee, Indian Territory
1,000?
Delaware with the Seneca in New York3
Hampton and Lawrence schools3
Muncie in New York, principally with Onondaga and Seneca
36
Munsee with Stockbridge (total 133), Green Bay Agency, Wis.
23?
Munsee with Chippewa at Pottawatomie and Great Nemaha Agency, Kansas (total 75)
37?
Munsee with Chippewa on the Thames, Ontario
131
“Moravians” of the Thames, Ontario288
Delaware with Six Nations on Grand River, Ontario134
1,750?
Kickapoo:
Sac and Fox Agency, Indian Territory325
Pottawatomie and Great Nemaha Agency, Kansas
237
In Mexico200?
762?
Menominee:
Green Bay Agency, Wisconsin1,311
Carlisle school1
1,312
Miami:
Quapaw Agency, Indian Territory67
Indiana, no agency300?
Lawrence and Carlisle schools7
374?
Micmac:
Restigouche, Maria, and Gaspé, Quebec732
In Nova Scotia2,145
New Brunswick912
Prince Edward Island319
4,108
Misisauga:
Alnwick, New Credit, etc., Ontario774
Monsoni, Maskegon, etc.:
Eastern Rupert’s Land, British America4,016
Montagnais:
Betsiamits, Lake St. John, Grand Romaine, etc., Quebec1,607
Seven Islands, Quebec312
1,919
Nascapee:
Lower St. Lawrence, Quebec2,860
50Ojibwa:
White Earth Agency, Minnesota6,263
La Pointe Agency, Wisconsin4,778
Mackinac Agency, Michigan (about one-third of 5,563 Ottawa and Chippewa)
1,854?
Mackinac Agency, Michigan (Chippewa alone)
1,351
Devil’s Lake Agency, North Dakota (Turtle Mountain Chippewa)
1,340
Pottawatomie and Great Nemaha Agency, Kansas (one-half of 75 Chippewa and Muncie)
38?
Lawrence and Carlisle schools15
“Ojibbewas” of Lake Superior and Lake Huron, Ontario5,201
“Chippewas” of Sarnia, etc., Ontario1,956
“Chippewas” with Munsees on Thames, Ontario454
“Chippewas” with Pottawatomies on Walpole Island, Ontario658
“Ojibbewas” with Ottawas (total 1,856) on Manitoulin and Cockburn Islands, Ontario928?
“Salteaux” of treaty Nos. 3 and 4, etc., Manitoba, etc.4,092
“Chippewas” with Crees in Manitoba, etc., treaties Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (total Chippewa and Cree, 6,066)3,000?
31,928?
Ottawa:
Quapaw Agency, Indian Territory137
Mackinac Agency, Michigan (5,563 Ottawa and Chippewa)
3,709?
Lawrence and Carlisle schools20
With “Ojibbewas” on Manitoulin and Cockburn Islands, Ontario
928
4,794?
Peoria, etc.:
Quapaw Agency, Indian Territory160
Lawrence and Carlisle schools5
165
Pottawatomie:
Sac and Fox Agency, Indian Territory480
Pottawatomie and Great Nemaha Agency, Kansas
462
Mackinac Agency, Michigan77
Prairie band, Wisconsin280
Carlisle, Lawrence and Hampton schools117
With Chippewa on Walpole Island, Ontario
166
1,582
Sac and Fox:
Sac and Fox Agency, Indian Territory515
Sac and Fox Agency, Iowa381
Pottawatomie and Great Nemaha Agency, Kansas
77
Lawrence, Hampton, and Carlisle schools
8
981
Shawnee:
Quapaw Agency, Indian Territory79
Sac and Fox Agency, Indian Territory640
Incorporated with Cherokee, Indian Territory
800?
Lawrence, Carlisle, and Hampton schools
40
1,559?
Siksika:
Blackfoot Agency, Montana. (Blackfoot, Blood, Piegan)1,811
Blackfoot reserves in Alberta, British America (with Sarcee and Assiniboine)
4,932
6,743
51Stockbridge (Mahican):
Green Bay Agency, Wisconsin110
In New York (with Tuscarora and Seneca)
7
Carlisle school4
121